IngredientPhase Out Complete6 min read

PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances) in Food & Cosmetics: Regulatory Intelligence

Comprehensive regulatory tracker for PFAS in food contact materials, food packaging, and cosmetics. Covers the FDA voluntary phase-out, 15+ state bans, MoCRA cosmetics report, EU REACH restriction proposal, and EPA drinking water limits.

Key Deadlines

Jan 6, 2025

35 FDA food contact notifications for PFAS revoked

Jun 30, 2025

FDA compliance deadline for existing PFAS food packaging stock

Dec 29, 2025

FDA published MoCRA PFAS in cosmetics safety report

Jan 1, 2026

Illinois PFAS food packaging ban takes effect

Dec 31, 2026

ECHA target for completing EU PFAS restriction evaluation

Jan 1, 2030

Maine: PFAS banned in ALL products sold in state

What Are PFAS?

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — universally known as PFAS or "forever chemicals" — are a class of more than 14,000 synthetic organofluorine compounds defined by a common structural feature: chains of carbon atoms bonded to fluorine atoms. The carbon-fluorine bond is one of the strongest in organic chemistry, which gives PFAS their defining commercial properties — resistance to heat, water, grease, and stains — and makes them virtually indestructible in the environment.

PFAS are not a single chemical. They are a family of thousands of compounds. The most studied members include:

  • PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) — Legacy long-chain PFAS. IARC Group 1 carcinogen. Stockholm Convention Annex A (2019).
  • PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid) — Legacy long-chain PFAS. IARC Group 2B. Stockholm Convention Annex B (2009).
  • PFHxS — Stockholm Convention Annex A (2022).
  • GenX (HFPO-DA) — Replacement chemistry for PFOA, now itself subject to EPA limits.
  • 6:2 FTOH — Short-chain PFAS used in food packaging grease-proofing. Subject of FDA's voluntary phase-out.

The critical regulatory trend: regulators are increasingly treating PFAS as a class rather than individual compounds. State laws, the EU restriction proposal, and the Stockholm Convention are all moving toward class-based restrictions.

Since the early 2000s, PFAS have been found in the blood of approximately 98% of Americans tested. For the food industry, primary exposure pathways are PFAS used intentionally in food contact materials (grease-proof packaging, pizza boxes, microwave popcorn bags) and PFAS that contaminate food through environmental pathways (agricultural water, biosolids, contaminated seafood).

FDA Regulatory Status

Food Contact Materials: Voluntary Phase-Out Complete

The FDA secured voluntary commitments from manufacturers to phase out short-chain PFAS grease-proofing agents on paper and paperboard food packaging.

  • February 28, 2024: FDA announced all manufacturers ceased sales of PFAS grease-proofing agents for food packaging
  • January 6, 2025: FDA formally revoked 35 Food Contact Notifications (FCNs) related to PFAS in food packaging
  • June 30, 2025: Compliance deadline for exhausting existing stock produced before January 6, 2025

The phase-out was limited to grease-proofing on paper and paperboard. It did not address PFAS in other food contact materials (non-stick coatings, processing equipment, non-paper packaging).

Cosmetics: MoCRA Report Reveals Data Gaps

On December 29, 2025, the FDA published its MoCRA-mandated report on PFAS in cosmetics:

  • 51 PFAS are used in 1,744 cosmetic formulations in the U.S. market
  • Five PFAS appeared to present low safety concerns
  • One PFAS was identified as having a potential safety concern
  • For most PFAS, safety could not be definitively established due to insufficient data

There is currently no federal regulation prohibiting PFAS in cosmetics. States are filling this void aggressively.

FDA Total Diet Study

The FDA has been testing foods for PFAS since 2019. December 2025 data (2024 collections) found one or more PFAS in 39 of 542 food samples (~7.2%). Foods with detectable levels included seafood, meat products, dairy, and kale. Four seafood samples showed concentrations beyond trace levels.

Key Deadlines

DateEventType
January 6, 202535 PFAS Food Contact Notifications revokedFederal
June 30, 2025FDA compliance deadline for existing PFAS food packaging stockFederal
December 29, 2025FDA published MoCRA PFAS in cosmetics reportFederal
January 1, 2026Illinois PFAS food packaging ban takes effectState
Late 2026ECHA target for completing EU PFAS restriction evaluationInternational
January 1, 2027New Mexico PFAS food packaging ban takes effectState
2029-2031EPA PFAS drinking water compliance deadline (PFOA/PFOS at 4 ppt)Federal
January 1, 2030Maine: PFAS banned in ALL products (unless unavoidable use exemption)State
January 1, 2032Minnesota Amara's Law: final phase of broader PFAS bansState

State-Level Bans: Food Packaging

At least 15 states have enacted laws banning PFAS in food packaging. Key jurisdictions:

StateLawEffectiveScope
New YorkS8817Dec 2022Intentionally added PFAS in food packaging
CaliforniaAB 1200Jan 2023Plant fiber food packaging; 100 ppm total organic fluorine
MaineLD 1503Jan 2023Food packaging; ALL products by 2030
ConnecticutSB 837Jan 2023Intentionally added PFAS in food packaging
VermontS.20Jul 2023Comprehensive food packaging ban
WashingtonHB 1648Jan 2023Specified plant-fiber food packaging
ColoradoHB 22-1345Jan 2024Intentionally added PFAS in food packaging
MinnesotaAmara's LawJan 2025Food packaging; broader products phased through 2032
OregonHB 3043Jan 2025Food packaging
Rhode IslandH 7438Jan 2025Intentionally added PFAS in food packaging
IllinoisHB 4144Jan 2026Food packaging and food contact products
New MexicoHB 212Jan 2027Food packaging, cookware, other categories

Maine LD 1503 is the most sweeping: by January 1, 2030, all products with intentionally added PFAS are banned unless the DEP grants a "currently unavoidable use" exemption.

PFAS in Cosmetics: State Bans

With no federal restrictions, states have enacted PFAS cosmetics bans:

Effective January 1, 2025:

  • California (AB 2771) — Intentionally added PFAS in cosmetics prohibited
  • Colorado (HB 22-1345) — Intentionally added PFAS in cosmetics prohibited
  • Maryland (HB 643) — Intentionally added PFAS in cosmetics prohibited
  • Minnesota — PFAS in cosmetics restricted under Amara's Law
  • Washington — PFAS in cosmetics restricted

Additional states (New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island) have bans taking effect 2026-2028.

EPA Drinking Water Standards

On April 10, 2024, the EPA finalized the first-ever PFAS drinking water limits:

  • PFOA and PFOS: 4 parts per trillion (ppt) each
  • PFHxS, PFNA, GenX: 10 ppt individual limits
  • PFAS mixtures: Hazard Index MCL

In May 2025, the EPA retained PFOA/PFOS limits at 4 ppt but moved to vacate limits for GenX, PFHxS, PFNA, and PFBS. The D.C. Circuit denied EPA's request for summary vacatur in January 2026. Compliance deadline proposed to extend from 2029 to 2031.

IARC Classifications

In November 2023 (Monographs Volume 135):

  • PFOA: Group 1 — Carcinogenic to humans (same as asbestos, benzene, tobacco)
  • PFOS: Group 2B — Possibly carcinogenic to humans

International Status

EU Universal PFAS Restriction (REACH)

Five national authorities submitted a restriction proposal to ECHA in January 2023 covering all PFAS. The August 2025 updated proposal expanded derogated uses from 26 to 74 with phase-out periods up to 13.5 years. ECHA targets completing scientific evaluation by end of 2026.

Stockholm Convention

Progressive PFAS listings: PFOS (2009), PFOA (2019), PFHxS (2022), long-chain PFCAs (2025). The U.S. has signed but not ratified the Convention.

Canada

Proposed adding broad PFAS class to Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations under CEPA.

Affected Product Categories

  • Pizza boxes, bakery tissue, sandwich wraps, french fry containers
  • Microwave popcorn bags
  • Fast-food wrappers and takeout containers
  • Paper plates and cups
  • Compostable/plant-fiber packaging (historically used PFAS for grease resistance)

Cosmetics:

  • Foundations, concealers, lip products, mascaras, sunscreens, moisturizers (51 PFAS in 1,744 formulations per FDA report)

Foods at Risk of Environmental Contamination:

  • Seafood (particularly freshwater fish, shellfish)
  • Dairy products (biosolids pathway)
  • Meat products
  • Leafy greens irrigated with contaminated water

Other:

  • Cookware (non-stick coatings)
  • Dietary supplement packaging
  • Infant formula packaging

What Companies Should Do

Immediate Actions

1. Audit your supply chain for PFAS. Map every food contact material, packaging component, and cosmetic ingredient against PFAS definitions used by the strictest applicable jurisdiction.

2. Map your state exposure. If you sell in any of the 15+ states with active bans, your compliance obligation is set by the strictest applicable law.

3. Document your PFAS status. Be prepared to demonstrate compliance. California's AG has signaled active enforcement.

4. Review cosmetic formulations. With 51 PFAS across 1,744 formulations in the FDA report, proactively assess reformulation needs.

Medium-Term Planning

5. Prepare for Maine's 2030 all-products ban. The most expansive PFAS law in the nation.

6. Monitor the EU REACH restriction. ECHA draft opinion expected early-to-mid 2026 will signal which categories get derogations.

7. Track replacement chemistry risks. Replacing one PFAS with another is not a durable strategy — class-based restrictions are the direction of travel.

8. Assess water sources. If your facility uses municipal water, confirm PFAS compliance status. If using well water near known contamination sites, conduct PFAS testing.

Regulatory Intelligence

Policy Canary tracks PFAS regulatory actions across FDA, state legislatures, EPA, and international bodies. Subscribe to receive alerts when new PFAS actions affect your products.

Share this article

Monitor your products

FDA intelligence for your specific products. 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

More Ingredient Intelligence

Ingredient8 min

Parabens: FDA Status, State Bans & Global Restrictions for Food and Cosmetics

Parabens face a rapidly shifting regulatory landscape — from California's food and cosmetics bans to EU concentration limits and 20+ state-level restrictions. Here's what food and cosmetics companies need to know.

Read more →
Ingredient6 min

NMN (Nicotinamide Mononucleotide): FDA Drug Preclusion Reversal & Supplement Status

After a three-year regulatory battle, the FDA reversed its drug preclusion determination for NMN in September 2025, confirming it is lawful in dietary supplements. Here is everything regulatory professionals need to know.

Read more →
Ingredient8 min

Lead in Food, Supplements, and Cosmetics: FDA Regulatory Intelligence

Lead is a toxic heavy metal that contaminates food, dietary supplements, and cosmetics through environmental exposure, processing equipment, and occasionally deliberate adulteration. FDA's Closer to Zero initiative is setting action levels for baby food, juice, and candy, while the 2023 WanaBana applesauce recall exposed systemic failures in spice supply chain oversight.

Read more →
Ingredient6 min

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa): FDA Regulatory Status, State Bans & 7-OH Scheduling

Kratom remains unapproved by the FDA for any use, subject to Import Alert 54-15, and caught in a regulatory tug-of-war between state bans, Consumer Protection Acts, and a federal push to schedule concentrated 7-hydroxymitragynine. Here is what companies in the dietary supplement and functional beverage space need to track.

Read more →
Ingredient9 min

Talc: FDA Review, IARC Reclassification & Regulatory Intelligence

Comprehensive regulatory intelligence on talc (magnesium silicate), covering FDA expert panel recommendations, IARC Group 2A reclassification, EU Category 1B carcinogen classification, the J&J litigation, asbestos contamination testing, MoCRA implications, and state-level bans on talc in menstrual products.

Read more →
Ingredient8 min

Formaldehyde: FDA Regulatory Status, State Bans & Global Restrictions

Formaldehyde is an IARC Group 1 carcinogen facing an accelerating patchwork of state bans in cosmetics, a repeatedly delayed federal proposed rule, active mass tort litigation with 11,400+ pending cases, and an August 2026 EU REACH deadline. Here is what FDA-regulated companies need to know.

Read more →

What if this analysis was about YOUR products?

Policy Canary monitors the FDA for your specific products — by name, by ingredient, by facility. Start your free trial.

Start Free Trial